58.5k views
2 votes
History

Museum
Tate Modern
Victoria and
Albert
Museum
4
5
16
14
Choose 1 answer:
17
23
Researchers recently conducted an experiment to understand how we use
rankings to make decisions. They created a fictitious travel website
describing five museums in London. Then, they invited two groups of
participants, who had never visited the museums, to review the site and
select the museum they would be most likely to visit. Meanwhile, the
researchers tracked the amount of time each participant spent reading
about each museum. For one group, the website ranked each museum,
titling the page "The Top 5 Museums in London." For the other group, the
museums and their descriptions were not ranked. The researchers
concluded that when reviewing ranked lists, we tend to focus on the top-
ranked option.
Which choice best describes data in the table that support the researchers'
conclusion?
Participants who were not provided with a ranking of the
museums spent roughly equal amounts of time reading about each
museum.

User JayWHY
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer: choice D

Step-by-step explanation:

The choice that best describes data in the table supporting the researchers' conclusion is:

(Choice D) Participants who were provided with a ranking of the museums spent disproportionately more time reading about the British Museum.

This choice aligns with the researchers' conclusion that when reviewing ranked lists, participants tend to focus more on the top-ranked option, which, in this case, is the British Museum.

User Tolokoban
by
8.5k points
3 votes

The data shows that without museum rankings, participants spent equal time on each, contrasting with the tendency to focus on top-ranked choices when rankings are given, which influences decision-making.

The choice that best describes data in the table supporting the researchers' conclusion is that participants who were not provided with a ranking of the museums spent roughly equal amounts of time reading about each museum. This indicates that when a ranking is absent, participants do not show a particular bias towards any option, which contrasts with behavior when a ranking is present. In that scenario, individuals tend to focus more on the top-ranked options, suggesting that rankings can influence decision-making patterns by drawing more attention to certain choices.

The data in the table that supports the researchers' conclusion is that participants who were not provided with a ranking of the museums spent roughly equal amounts of time reading about each museum. This means that without the influence of rankings, participants were more likely to give equal attention to all the museums and consider each one as a potential option.

User Michael Hoffmann
by
7.5k points