The data shows that without museum rankings, participants spent equal time on each, contrasting with the tendency to focus on top-ranked choices when rankings are given, which influences decision-making.
The choice that best describes data in the table supporting the researchers' conclusion is that participants who were not provided with a ranking of the museums spent roughly equal amounts of time reading about each museum. This indicates that when a ranking is absent, participants do not show a particular bias towards any option, which contrasts with behavior when a ranking is present. In that scenario, individuals tend to focus more on the top-ranked options, suggesting that rankings can influence decision-making patterns by drawing more attention to certain choices.
The data in the table that supports the researchers' conclusion is that participants who were not provided with a ranking of the museums spent roughly equal amounts of time reading about each museum. This means that without the influence of rankings, participants were more likely to give equal attention to all the museums and consider each one as a potential option.