Final answer:
The idea that well-designed strategies are valuable without effective implementation is false. In history exercises, the colonists' objection to taxation without representation is true, the importance of land acquisition in early U.S. Indian policy is true, and the shortcomings of majority rule in multi-choice scenarios is also true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the best-designed strategies are valuable whether or not they are effectively implemented is false. A strategy, no matter how well it is designed, can only prove to be valuable when it is effectively implemented. Without implementation, a strategy remains a theoretical construct with no real-world impact or benefits.
Turning to the history-related exercises:
- Exercise 7.3.1: True. The colonists objected more to the lack of representation and say in how tax money would be spent than to taxation in principle.
- Acquisition of land was indeed a central motivating factor in the formulation of early U.S. Indian policy, making Exercise 11.1.2's statement true.
- Regarding majority rule, it is true that it can fail to produce a single preferred outcome when there are more than two choices, due to vote splitting and the potential for no choice receiving a majority of support.