Final answer:
The Richmond convention contradicted the expectations of the Virginia majority by exercising federal powers such as a military draft, which conflicted with states' rights sentiments. Despite initial opposition, Virginia ratified the Constitution by a narrow margin after influential leaders advocated for it and promised a Bill of Rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the preamble, the Richmond convention undertook actions deemed contrary to the expectations of a majority of the people of Virginia by exercising powers that appeared to contradict the prevalent states' rights sentiments at the time. The Confederate government in Richmond, Virginia, instituted sweeping measures such as the imposition of a military draft to ensure victory against the Union, which went against the grain of the Southern belief in the primacy of state sovereignty. This federal exercise of power, including provisions that permitted the hiring of substitutes to avoid conscription, ultimately favored the wealthy and caused widespread resentment and resistance among those who couldn't afford to avoid service.
The Ratification of the Constitution by Virginia was a contentious process marked by the state's close vote (89-79) for approval. Initially, many delegates at the convention were opposed to the new constitution, fearing the loss of state powers. However, these individuals were eventually persuaded to support ratification because of the promise of a Bill of Rights and strategic interventions by influential figures like Madison and Washington. Ultimately, on June 25, 1788, Virginia's approval significantly propelled the Constitution towards broader support necessary for its effectiveness.