133k views
0 votes
Audit Documentation should enable a knowledgeable and experienced reviewer to:

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Audit Documentation should be reviewed in a way that allows a knowledgeable and experienced individual to understand the audit process and evaluate the evidence and conclusions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Audit Documentation should enable a knowledgeable and experienced reviewer to comprehend the nature, timing, and extent of the audit procedures performed, as well as evaluate the evidence gathered and understand the conclusions reached. When reviewing audit documentation, one opens the document to be reviewed and examines it critically to identify areas for improvement or to affirm strong sections.

steps for reviewing audit documentation:

  1. Open the document you want to review and click the Review tab above the tools ribbon.
  2. Read the draft carefully, looking for areas where comments can be positive as well as potential revisions.
  3. Understand the draft's argument, methodology, and whether the draft aligns with ethical guidelines.
  4. Check for clarity in the rationale of the research, the description of research conducted, and its adherence to ethical standards.
  5. Look for any design, methodological, or analytical flaws that could affect the study's conclusions.
  6. Consider the valuable feedback received from peer review processes.

Reviewing with a critical eye not only assesses the content for accuracy and coherence but also examines the draft's significance in advancing knowledge. Reviewers provide constructive feedback and suggestions for improvements, making sure the audit documentation is comprehensive and follows historical context and credibility, ultimately ensuring the work's enhancement through the processing of feedback.

User Stetzon
by
7.4k points