Final answer:
Comparing Roman Polanski's 1971 adaptation of Macbeth to the original play reveals differences in tension building, character development, and audience experience, as film techniques allow visual and auditory elements to enhance the story.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing Roman Polanski's 1971 film adaptation of Macbeth to the original play by Shakespeare, specifically Act 3, Scene 3, it's important to consider the interpretation and presentation of the scene. In the play, this scene often builds tension through dialogue and dramatic irony, while Polanski's adaptation might use visual effects, sound design, and the actors' performances to convey the sinister atmosphere and further character development, creating a more immersive and possibly a more intense experience.
In Shakespeare's play, the narrative relies heavily on the audience's imagination and the actors' delivery of the lines to convey the developing paranoia and descent into madness, especially in Macbeth's character. Contrastingly, Polanski might have the ability to show this visually, for instance, through close-ups of Macbeth's expressions or by altering the setting to reflect the dark turn in the narrative.
Also, the interpretation of the text in performance might differ; Polanski could have added or omitted dialogue and scenes, or placed emphasis on different aspects of the scene compared to how it's typically staged in theater productions. Such changes may influence the audience's understanding and perspective on the themes and characters of Macbeth.