Question

Marty, a supervisor for Paul's Pool Supplies, was accused of stealing pool supplies and selling them to friends and relatives at reduced prices. Since Marty has been a good employee for five years, you decide to give him an administrative leave, without pay, until you can investigate the situation. Marty was:

A. demoted.
B. fired.
C. suspended.
D. reprimanded.

Answer 1

Marty, who is being investigated for theft at Paul's Pool Supplies, was suspended. This is not to be confused with a demotion, termination, or reprimand, as the suspension involves temporary removal from his duties without pay during the investigation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The situation described with Marty, a supervisor at Paul's Pool Supplies, pertains to business and employee management practices. The correct action taken by the company in response to the accusations made against Marty was: C. suspended. Being on administrative leave without pay while an investigation is ongoing is a form of suspension. It is not a demotion, as his job title has not changed; it is not a termination, as he still holds his position pending the outcome of the investigation; and it is not merely a reprimand, as he has been removed from his duties during the investigation.

Marty's case could involve complex ethical and legal considerations, including the possibility of an employee appealing to a higher authority to justify their actions if they are indeed found guilty of the accusations. This concept is known as an appeal to a higher authority, and it may present itself during the investigation, where Marty could assert that his alleged actions were for the greater good, such as supporting a family member in need.