Final answer:
The Supreme Court of Ohio faced major issues due to the state's original constitution, such as lack of clear guidelines and structure and instability in appointments. Changes to the constitution improved the Supreme Court by providing clearer guidelines and structure and addressing the major issues. These changes were a good idea as they promoted fairness, impartiality, and efficiency in the Supreme Court's decision-making process.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court of Ohio faced major issues because of the state's original constitution. One major issue was that the original constitution did not provide the Supreme Court with clear guidelines and structure, leading to confusion and uncertainty in decision-making. Additionally, the original constitution did not establish clear processes for appointments and terms of justices, which caused instability and politi-cal interference in the Supreme Court.
Changes to the constitution affected the state's Supreme Court by providing clearer guidelines and structure. For example, amendments were made to establish defined terms and appointment processes for justices, which helped ensure the independence and impartiality of the Supreme Court. These changes also helped improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Supreme Court in handling cases.
In my opinion, these changes were a good idea because they addressed the major issues faced by the Supreme Court and improved the functioning of the judicial system in Ohio. By providing clearer guidelines and structure, the changes helped promote fairness, impartiality, and efficiency in the Supreme Court's decision-making process, ultimately benefiting the citizens of Ohio.