Final answer:
The authors of "Saving the Lost" and "How one scientist is working to reach people in vegetative states" present the efficacy of neuroimaging differently. The former highlights successful cases while the latter explores its limitations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The authors of "Saving the Lost" and "How one scientist is working to reach people in vegetative states" present the efficacy of neuroimaging differently. In "Saving the Lost," the author presents neuroimaging as a powerful tool for identifying and treating brain disorders. They provide examples of successful cases where neuroimaging helped save the lives of patients. On the other hand, in "How one scientist is working to reach people in vegetative states," the author explores the limitations of neuroimaging in reaching people in vegetative states. They discuss the challenges faced by scientists in interpreting neuroimaging results in this particular context.
The details from "Saving the Lost" that support this analysis include the description of how neuroimaging helped detect a brain tumor in a patient, leading to successful treatment. Additionally, the author mentions the accuracy of neuroimaging in identifying brain regions involved in language processing.
From "How one scientist is working to reach people in vegetative states," the details that support this analysis include the discussion of false positives and false negatives in neuroimaging results for vegetative patients. The author also mentions the limitations of neuroimaging in capturing the complexity of brain activity in these patients.