Question

In paragraph 1, Bejan says, "Free speech for some, they argue, serves only to silence and exclude others. Denying hateful or historically 'privileged' voices a platform is thus necessary to make equality effective, so that the marginalized and vulnerable can finally speak up—and be heard." What rhetorical device is being used? How does its use affect the way the text is read and understood?

A) Classification; It categorizes different speech types.
B) Negation; It highlights the argument against free speech.
C) Exemplification; It provides examples of free speech effects.
D) Function; It describes the purpose of free speech limitations.

Answer 1

B) Negation; It highlights the argument against free speech.

Step-by-step explanation:

In paragraph 1, Bejan utilizes the rhetorical device of negation by presenting the viewpoint that free speech, for some, is argued to silence and exclude others. This device involves the denial or contradiction of a certain idea, emphasizing the opposing perspective on free speech. The use of negation in this context draws attention to the argument against the unrestricted nature of free speech, suggesting that limiting certain voices is necessary for achieving equality and amplifying marginalized voices.

The employment of negation in Bejan's statement shapes the reader's interpretation by foregrounding the opposing stance on free speech. By emphasizing the potential negative consequences of unrestricted free speech, the text encourages readers to critically consider the balance between allowing diverse opinions and preventing harm or exclusion. This rhetorical choice adds nuance to the discussion on free speech, prompting readers to reflect on the complexities involved in ensuring an inclusive and equitable discourse.

The various rhetorical devices and their impact on persuasive writing, especially in the context of discussing controversial topics and freedom of speech.