Question

You may recall the neoclassical writers Jonathan Swift and Samuel Johnson were concerned about preserving the English language, which they believed was in a state of constant deterioration. Earlier in this unit, you completed an activity in which you analyze language rules and related questions of usage. In this task, you will choose a common topic related to language usage and grammar, examine it in detail, and write a short essay to present your findings.

Choose one of the topics listed below are a topic of your choice that is related to language issues and usage:
Double negatives "Ain’t" Incorrect or non-standard verb forms Frequently confused words. Use of around and onto replace more specific prepositions such as about.
Write an essay on the language issue you’ve chosen which you explain the background of the issue and take a stance on regarding the usage rules related to the issue. Be sure your essay addresses the following points:
1. Explain the rules or language issue you chose
2. Discuss if there are times when the language rule can be broken or changed.
3. Explain the views of language experts on this topic
4. Include the data on you said you gather from your interactions with friends by listening to people on the radio or on TV.
Take a clear stance about the usage rules related to the issue you chose.

Answer 1

This essay discusses the ongoing debate over language preservation and correct usage, examining topics like double negatives and non-standard verb forms. It highlights the importance of context in determining when it is appropriate to adhere to standard English versus embracing linguistic diversity. The discussion reflects the perspectives of both prescriptive and descriptive grammar, emphasizing language as a dynamic tool for communication.

Step-by-step explanation:

Preserving Language: A Case for Clarity in Usage

The English language is a rich tapestry of words, expressions, and grammatical structures that allow for diverse and nuanced communication. However, its richness often comes with complexity, leading to debates over what constitutes “correct” usage. Among the topics that spark discussion are the use of double negatives, non-standard verb forms, frequently confused words, and regionalisms like ‘ain’t’. Jonathan Swift and Samuel Johnson, neoclassical writers concerned about the “deterioration” of English, would have much to say about these issues. For example, negative concord, commonly labeled a double negative, is often used in dialects around the world and adds emphasis in expression. While prescriptive grammarians might balk, descriptivists argue that language evolves, and such constructions can be rich in meaning within context.

In professional settings where precision is paramount, adherence to standard English is typically expected. Yet, language is also an expression of identity, and the rules can and do bend in personal or cultural contexts. Experts often have nuanced views acknowledging both a need for a standard language in certain spheres and the value of linguistic diversity and evolution. Observing everyday language usage through media and personal interactions provides valuable data on how English is actually used versus how it is traditionally taught. Linguistically speaking, there are times for linguistic prescriptivism and times for descriptivism, depending on the context and the audience.

In conclusion, while we may strive for clarity and uniformity in certain domains, it is important to recognize and embrace the dynamic nature of language. We must find a balance that allows for effective communication without disregarding the cultural richness that comes from our linguistic variations. After all, language's primary function is to convey meaning, not to adhere rigidly to arbitrary rules.