Final answer:
A) Yes, the Electoral College should be replaced because it's outdated and undemocratic.
The debate on whether to replace the Electoral College involves arguments about it being outdated and not reflective of the popular will versus it ensuring balanced representation for smaller states.
Changes like adopting direct popular vote or a proportional electoral system are suggested. Nevertheless, electoral reform faces significant challenges and would require extensive political agreement.
Step-by-step explanation:
Opinions vary on whether the Electoral College should be replaced or reformed.
Advocates for change argue that it is an outdated system that depresses voter turnout and fails to accurately represent the popular will, especially when considering instances where a candidate wins the presidency without the majority of the popular vote.
They suggest that direct popular vote or a proportional electoral system might be more democratic and reflective of the people’s choice.
One of the main arguments in favor of the Electoral College is that it provides a balance by ensuring that smaller states and less densely populated areas have a voice, preventing a scenario where only the most populated regions determine the outcome of an election. However, critics argue that this advantage for smaller states overrepresents them in terms of actual voter population and undermines the principle of 'one person, one vote'.
While the debate continues, it is clear that any change to this system would require a significant political consensus and possibly a constitutional amendment, highlighting the complexity of electoral reform in the United States.