Final answer:
While the roaring 20s were a time of progress and prosperity for many, Indigenous peoples in Canada and Native peoples in the United States experienced significant oppression and challenges, highlighting that societal peace can mask deep-seated conflicts and injustices experienced by certain groups within the same time period.
Step-by-step explanation:
During the roaring 20s, while some groups in society enjoyed peace and prosperity, others, such as the Indigenous peoples in Canada, did not share in this experience. Exemplifying this contrast is the treatment of Native peoples in the United States. despite the period being seen as progressive and peaceful for many, Native Americans faced significant challenges in the form of cultural suppression, land loss, and forced assimilation policies, leading to long-lasting impacts that were anything but peaceful for these communities.
From the end of the Indian Wars into the 20th century, many Native Americans were subjected to Americanization policies that aimed to assimilate them into American society through measures such as individual land ownership, Christian worship, and education for children. These initiatives often disrupted traditional ways of life and led to loss of culture and self-determination. Safeguards for the practice of traditional religion were not established until the Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978, and the capability to reclaim ancestral human remains and sacred items was not granted until the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990.Moreover, the early 20th century also saw a continuation of racial violence and discrimination against African-Americans, exemplified by the destruction of the Greenwood neighborhood in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in 1921, and the resurgence of the white supremacist Ku Klux Klan. These events and policies starkly illustrate that periods of historical peace can coexist with immense suffering and injustice for specific groups within the same society.