Final answer:
Factors influencing juror selection include potential biases and preconceptions; a selected juror exemplifies impartiality, while one removed may show bias. The objective is to form a fair and objective jury to evaluate evidence and deliver a just verdict.
Step-by-step explanation:
When deciding what factors influenced your decisions about which jurors to keep or pass on, several aspects are carefully considered to ensure a fair and impartial jury. One must assess the potential jurors for any biases or preconceptions that might affect their judgment, ensuring they do not have any prejudices coming into the trial. For instance, a juror I selected was a person who had no strong opinions about the case and was not influenced by media coverage, indicating an ability to remain impartial. Conversely, a juror I put back into the jury pool exhibited a strong reaction during the voir dire process when discussing the nature of the charge, suggesting a possible bias.
The selection process involves strategizing to form a jury that can objectively evaluate the evidence and provide a fair verdict. It is a critical stage where both defense and prosecution aim to seat jurors sympathetic to their side without compromising the trial's integrity. Ultimately, the goal is to form a jury that can reach a verdict whether the evidence overwhelmingly points toward guilt, or innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.