Final answer:
The main difference between the two authors is that Text 1 Author is cautious about teen employment due to potential downsides, while Text 2 Author is optimistic, suggesting teens can gain benefits from work by starting with manageable hours.
Step-by-step explanation:
The main difference between the authors’ conclusions about teens who work is regarding the perceived impact of employment on teenagers and the extent to which working hours should be managed. Text 1 Author suggests that for many teens, working may not have enough benefits to justify the downsides, indicating a more cautious stance towards teen employment. On the other hand, Text 2 Author believes that teens can enjoy the benefits of working and earning a paycheck as long as they manage their hours well to avoid negative effects, proposing a more optimistic view of teen work experiences.
While the first author warns about the potential downsides of teen employment, the second author emphasizes that starting with a few hours of work can provide both financial benefits and valuable work experience without risking overwork. Importantly, neither text suggests that students should only work at jobs with fair pay as a difference, nor do they discuss risks associated with working too many hours as a disagreement point. Instead, the crux of the difference lies in the first author’s suggestion to be wary of employment at this life stage and the second author’s encouragement to find a balance between work benefits and risks.