Final answer:
Paragraphs 91-92 suggest the author opposes remaining silent, which is further supported by legal precedents requiring explicit invocation of the right to silence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the information given, paragraphs 91-92 suggest that the author's opinion is that remaining silent is not the best choice. The paraphrased excerpt indicates a confrontation between what the author believes to be defendable (position 'c', implying opposition to remaining silent) versus what is traditionally accepted (position 'b', potentially suggesting support for silence). Additionally, the importance of the decision regarding whether to remain silent is stressed, highlighting that it can affect one’s stance on serious personal and important issues. The Right to Remain Silent sections further show that legally, silence must be explicitly invoked, aligning with the opinion that simply remaining silent without declaration is insufficient. Therefore, the best answer is B. The author opposes remaining silent.