114k views
2 votes
Which statement most accurately evaluates the positions held by the federalists and anti-federalists concerning ratification of the U.S. Constitution?

1) The federalists supported the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, while the anti-federalists opposed it.
2) The federalists and anti-federalists both supported the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
3) The federalists and anti-federalists both opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
4) The federalists were undecided about the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, while the anti-federalists opposed it.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The Federalists supported the ratification of the U.S. Constitution because they wanted a stronger national government, whereas the Anti-Federalists opposed it, fearing centralized power and the lack of a bill of rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

The debate over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution was primarily between two groups: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, including figures like James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, supported the ratification because they believed in the need for a stronger national government, as they argued in the The Federalist Papers. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed ratification, fearing that it would lead to a government with too much power, reminiscent of British tyranny, and they were concerned about the lack of a bill of rights to protect individual liberties.

The correct answer to the question is therefore: 1) The federalists supported the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, while the anti-federalists opposed it, due to their belief that the Constitution gave the national government too much power and lacked sufficient protection for individual rights.

User Dean Wild
by
8.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.