Final answer:
The assertion that the Huns were the primary cause of the Gupta Empire's loss of power and wealth is false. Multiple factors contributed to the empire's decline, and while the Huns' invasions were significant, they were not the only reason for the Gupta Empire's fall. Germanic migrations were influenced by the pressure put on their territories by the Huns, leading to the collapse of the Western Roman Empire.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "The fierce attacks of the Huns drained the Gupta Empire of its power and wealth." is false. The Huns indeed caused considerable disruption in northwestern India during their invasions, but the Gupta Empire initially withstood their attacks. It was a combination of factors including internal strife, weak rulers, and economic decline that led to the Gupta Empire's downfall.
Eventually, the empire did suffer losses due to Hun invasions, but they were not solely responsible for the fall of the Gupta Empire. Instead, the Empire fragmented into smaller states and witnessed the rise of other powerful empires such as the Pala and the Chola in different parts of the Indian subcontinent.
When evaluating the impact of the Huns on Germanic migrations, their movements indeed put pressure on the frontiers of the Roman Empire, pushing various tribes such as the Visigoths into Roman territories; however, they did not directly bribe them to sack Rome. The Huns' arrival in Europe had a domino effect on the movement of numerous Germanic tribes leading to significant historical events including the fall of the Western Roman Empire.