132k views
5 votes
What evidence does the narrator present to support that the morning was not "out of the ordinary"?

1) I heard a train running towards Woking.
2) After breakfast, instead of working, I decided to walk down towards the common.
3) I saw my neighbor gardening, chatted with him for a time, and then strolled in to breakfast.
4) The soldiers had made the people on the outskirts of Horsell lock up and leave their houses.

User Bobestm
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The evidence of an ordinary morning includes routine activities like having breakfast and observing daily life, while soldiers making people leave their homes indicates a disturbance.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question seems to be addressing a narrative passage where the narrator is reflecting on the normalcy of a morning before an implied significant event occurs. In the provided excerpts, evidence supporting an ordinary morning can be found in three main observations:

  • The mention of having breakfast, which is a typical daily routine, suggesting a sense of normalcy.
  • Observing daily activities such as gardening or people bustling in the streets, which indicates a typical morning scenario.
  • The interactions with neighbors and the option to casually decide to go for a walk also imply that the morning activities were not out of the ordinary.

However, the last piece of evidence provided, regarding soldiers making people lock up and leave their houses, directly contradicts the idea of a normal morning, as it suggests an unusual and possibly alarming situation.

Therefore, as a tutor, it is clear that the evidence supporting the concept of the morning being not 'out of the ordinary' includes routine breakfast, daily life observations, and casual social interactions, whereas the soldiers' actions suggest a disturbance to this normalcy.

User Yakya
by
7.9k points