Final answer:
Romeo references the cognitive bias of recency, which describes the overvaluation of recent experiences when predicting future events. This is also closely related to biases such as the gambler's fallacy and the sunk cost fallacy, which warp how we consider past events in respect to future outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The cognitive bias that Romeo identifies as explaining why we tend to think we cannot learn anything from the past is best related to the concept of recency bias. This refers to the tendency to overemphasize new and recent information while underestimating the value of older data. In the context of the information provided, it becomes evident that we often base our assumptions on a recent but atypical past and fail to consider the full spectrum of historical evidence. Additionally, biases like the gambler's fallacy and the sunk cost fallacy impair our reasoning by making us wrongly associate the past with predictions of future events, and overvalue what we've already invested in, respectively.
Moreover, the concept of historical knowledge and learning from the past is of great importance. As mentioned, while history doesn't repeat itself in the exact manner, it offers patterns that can help predict future behaviors and outcomes. Therefore, understanding these patterns and historical nuances is critical for making informed decisions in the present and future.