Final Answer:
The action that would have passed the Strickland test independently is Option C (3).
Step-by-step explanation:
The Strickland test is a legal standard used to assess the effectiveness of counsel in criminal cases. To determine which action passes the Strickland test independently, we evaluate each option against the two-pronged criterion established in the Strickland v. Washington case.
Firstly, the performance of counsel must be deficient, falling below the standard expected of reasonably competent attorneys. Secondly, this deficient performance must have resulted in prejudice to the defendant's case. Let's analyze Option C in light of these criteria.
In Option C, the attorney presented crucial evidence that was previously overlooked, demonstrating a proactive and diligent approach. This performance surpasses the reasonable competence standard. Additionally, this new evidence had a substantial impact on the case, overturning previous assumptions and benefiting the defendant. Thus, Option C not only meets but exceeds the Strickland test's requirements, making it the correct choice.
In conclusion, Option C stands out as the action that would have passed the Strickland test independently. The attorney's effective presentation of overlooked evidence not only meets but exceeds the criteria set by Strickland v. Washington, ensuring both competence and a positive impact on the case's outcome.