Final answer:
The least interpretative description of the Laussel woman would strictly detail physical attributes like the minimal depiction of limbs, small feet, and the absence of facial features, without attributing symbolic meaning to these characteristics.
Step-by-step explanation:
The description of the Laussel woman that is the least interpretative is one that focuses on the factual, physical characteristics of the figure. An example of a factual description would be noting that the sculptor created the figure with minimal attention to non-reproductive parts of the body, notably the limbs, which lack detailed musculature or anatomical accuracy. Additionally, it's observable that the figure's feet are small, which may indicate that the statue was not designed to stand freely. The upper arms are not clearly defined and appear to merge with the upper torso, and the lower arms are visible but barely detailed. The face lacks distinguishable features such as eyes, nose, ears, or mouth, directing the focus instead to the seven horizontal bands that encircle the head. These details, derived from the facts of the sculpture's physical attributes, are less interpretive than those that would attribute symbolic meaning or function to the various elements of the sculpture.