Question

Which one of the following actions does not result in higher levels of PAT productivity in assembling cameras or drones? Copyright © by Glo-Bus Software, Inc. Copying, distributing, or 3rd party website posting isexpressly prohibited and constitutes copyright violation. Reducing the number of camera/drone models being assembled Increasing the annual bonus for perfect attendance paid to camera/drone PAT members from $800 to $875 o Reducing annual expenditures to train camera/drone PATs in best practice assembly methods (because the time spent in training reduces the time available for assembling units) Increasing total annual compensation per camera/drone PAT member by a minimum of 2% and a maximum of 5% annually Maintaining a total compensation package that is above the industry average total compensation package (to minimize labor costs)

Answer 1

Reducing annual expenditures for training PATs in best practice assembly methods is the action that does not lead to higher PAT productivity for assembling cameras or drones. Proper training is crucial for high productivity and efficient assembly work.

Step-by-step explanation:

The action that does not result in higher levels of PAT productivity in assembling cameras or drones is reducing annual expenditures to train camera/drone PATs in best practice assembly methods. While it might seem that reducing training expenses can save time and increase productivity, the opposite is often true. Proper training can lead to better quality work, fewer errors, and ultimately higher productivity and efficiency. Training PATs in best practices is a crucial investment in the human capital of a company, enabling workers to perform at their best.

On the other hand, increasing the total compensation package for PAT members can lead to increased productivity by boosting morale and reducing turnover. Similarly, streamlining the number of models being assembled can optimize production processes and increase efficiency.