Question

Which arguments were made by anti-federalists during the debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution?

1) A bill of rights is unnecessary. We could not possibly list all the rights people have.
2) A strong central government is needed to maintain order.
3) Power should remain with the states as in the Articles of Confederation.
4) States may have some powers, but the central government must be supreme.
5) Giving too much power to a central government will lead to tyranny.
6) A bill of rights is needed to protect people from the abuses of government.

Answer 1

The arguments made by the Anti-Federalists during the ratification debates were the necessity of a bill of rights, the importance of state power, and the fear of tyranny from a strong central government.

Option 1&3&5.

Step-by-step explanation:

The arguments made by the Anti-Federalists during the debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution were:

1. A bill of rights is necessary to protect people from the abuses of government.
2. Power should remain with the states as in the Articles of Confederation.
3. Giving too much power to a central government will lead to tyranny.

The Anti-Federalists believed that a bill of rights was needed to safeguard individual liberties and prevent the national government from becoming too powerful. They argued that power should be decentralized and that a strong central government would ultimately infringe upon the rights of citizen

Learn more about Anti-Federalists' arguments during the ratification debates here: