Question

Which of these details would be relevant to explore the research topic, 'compare and contrast how Britain and Japan each affected one of the territories under their control, such as India and Korea'?

1) Britain allowed the Indian National Congress.
2) Japan had a policy of assimilation.
3) Japan did not allow a Korean government.
4) Japan promoted Japanese culture.
5) Korean schools taught Korean language.
6) The Indian National Congress had both Hindu and Muslim people.

Answer 1

The comparison between Britain's approach in India and Japan's in Korea involves contrasting colonial policies, from Britain's allowance of the Indian National Congress to Japan's policy of cultural assimilation and suppression of Korean governance.

Step-by-step explanation:

To explore the research topic of comparing and contrasting how Britain and Japan each affected territories under their control, such as India and Korea, one must consider several relevant factors. For Britain, the allowance of the Indian National Congress signified a step toward self-rule within India's struggle for independence. In contrast, Japan's aggressive colonial policy in Korea included a strict policy of assimilation, the suppression of a Korean government, the promotion of Japanese culture over Korean traditions, and the enforcement of Japanese in schools, minimizing the use of the Korean language.

These examples illustrate each country's approach to colonial governance and cultural integration. Britain's eventual recognition of Indian political structures like the Indian National Congress (which included both Hindu and Muslim members) stands in contrast to Japan's efforts to suppress Korean sovereignty and culture. This comparison highlights the different colonial legacies and the varied impacts of British and Japanese rule on their respective colonies.