170k views
1 vote
For [i], could never agree to give such encouragement to the slave trade as would be given by allowing them a representation for their negroes, and [i] did not believe those states would ever confederate on terms that would deprive them of that trade?

User Jscastro
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The question pertains to the historical compromises made at the Constitutional Convention addressing the slave trade, where the North and South reached agreements to keep the Union intact, counting slaves as three-fifths of a person and allowing the slave trade to continue until 1808.

Step-by-step explanation:

Compromise Over the Slave Trade

The subject of the question relates to the historical compromises made over the issue of slave trade during the formation of the United States Constitution. The compromises were deeply tied to the ongoing conflict between Northern and Southern states.

Northern states opposed the slave trade on moral grounds and also feared the political power Southern states would gain by importing more slaves, as slaves were to be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation and taxation.

Ultimately, the Constitutional Convention led to a compromise where the trans-Atlantic slave trade would continue until 1808, while Southern states threatened to leave the Union if slavery was abolished, affecting the potential unity of the new nation.

This compromise was also referred to as a "dirty compromise," particularly between New England and the Deep South, where the economic interests of both regions were protected for a time. The agreement allowed for the passage of commercial legislation in exchange for a continuation of the slave trade for twenty years. This resolution was seen as economically necessary by the South and was strategically important for the North.

User Lwi
by
6.9k points