Final answer:
Comparing and contrasting the reasoning in two passages involves examining how authors employ different strategies like analogy, cause and effect, and comparison. The integration of quotations and the impact of authors' personal and cultural contexts on their arguments and logic are considered to delineate the effectiveness of their persuasive techniques.
Step-by-step explanation:
When assessing how authors of two passages use reasoning to argue for their views, it's vital to recognize the various reasoning strategies they might employ, such as analogy, cause and effect, and comparison and contrast. In passage one, an author might integrate quotations seamlessly, using them to bolster their argument by directly tying them to their analysis or argument. Whereas, passage two might present quotations more independently, allowing them to stand alone before the author delivers a critique or builds upon them. Comparative analysis is a crucial aspect of such discussion, where similarities and differences in content, approach, or literary techniques, such as the use of evidence and reasoning, are highlighted. Logic and persuasion are significant in each author's style, drawing from their personal views and cultural backgrounds to shape their written works
Looking at the reasoning within narrative structures, one might notice the use of a problem and solution framework, where the author identifies an issue and posits a resolution, or the employment of classification and division to organize ideas and explore concepts in a more methodical way. The aim is to evaluate how effectively each author convinces the reader of their viewpoint and how their reasoning patterns support the thematic substance of their texts.