Final answer:
Yes, persons with more money often have greater influence over legislators. Studies show that the preferences of the wealthy more frequently align with government policies, and unlimited political contributions by corporations and unions bolster their political power. Other forms of citizen participation exist, but they often struggle to match the clout financial resources provide.
Step-by-step explanation:
Do persons with more money have greater influence over legislators than those with less money? According to studies, such as those by political scientist Martin Gilens, the interests of the wealthy have been shown to have a greater influence on government policy compared to the preferences of average citizens. This is evidenced in various ways, from the legislative makeup predominantly consisting of wealthy individuals to policies that tend to align more with wealthy citizens' preferences when there is disagreement among different income groups.
The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission further compounded this phenomenon by allowing corporations and unions to make unlimited contributions to Political Action Committees (PACs), which critics argue steps towards an oligarchic control in the political system. Wealthy individuals and entities can also wield influence through direct contributions, lobbying, and fostering model legislation. At the same time, the same Supreme Court ruling maintained limits on individual campaign contributions to prevent a single wealthy individual from having too much sway in political campaigns.
While money can have a significant impact, it's important to note that there are other means through which citizens can participate in the democratic process, such as volunteering, writing to officials, and engaging in public demonstration. Despite these alternatives, the financial power of a few often overshadows the voices of the less wealthy.