Final answer:
The statement that does not correctly represent the reasons for Southern opposition to the so-called tariff of abominations is that they supported protective tariffs. The South opposed the tariff because it favored Northern interests, infringed on states' rights, and was perceived to harm the Southern economy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Southerners hated the so-called tariff of abominations for a variety of reasons, but one statement that does not accurately represent their views is that they supported protective tariffs. The options can be assessed as follows:
- They believed it favored the North over the South - This is true because the tariff protected Northern manufacturers at the expense of Southern consumers who had to pay more for goods.
- They felt it violated states' rights - Southerners were proponents of states' rights and used this argument to oppose tariffs which they saw as overreach by the federal government.
- They thought it would hurt the economy - Indeed, Southerners were concerned that the tariff would damage their trade-dependent economy, particularly in agriculture, by raising prices for imported goods and fostering retaliation from European trading partners.
- Supported protective tariffs - This is the option that does not belong. Southerners generally did not support protective tariffs because they raised the cost of imported goods, which they relied on heavily since the South imported more than the North.
Therefore, the statement that does not correctly explain the Southern opposition to the tariff of abominations is that they supported protective tariffs.