Final answer:
To draw psychological conclusions consistently with science, base them on empirical evidence collected via the scientific method, using inductive and deductive reasoning for validation.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you want to draw psychological conclusions in a way that is consistent with the scientific aspects of psychology, your conclusions should be based on evidence collected according to the principles of the scientific method. This means using empirical evidence grounded in objective, tangible factors that can be observed repeatedly and relying on logical reasoning through both inductive and deductive methods. Empirical evidence is crucial as it comes from direct experience or scientifically gathered data, different from intuition, common sense, or unfounded personal beliefs. In the case of deductive reasoning, a hypothesis is tested against real-world scenarios to derive logical conclusions, whereas inductive reasoning uses specific results to build general scientific principles. Importantly, while evidence may strongly support a hypothesis, it can never be proven true because future evidence could potentially contradict it. The aim is to collect as much supportive evidence as possible to make the hypothesis more likely to be true, which underscores the continued pursuit of knowledge within the scientific community.
Therefore, conclusions drawn from personal feelings or intuitions, common beliefs, or unexamined common sense are insufficient when adhering to the scientific discipline of psychology. Such approaches may be subject to bias or lack the rigorous verification that scientific research demands.