Final answer:
The true nature of reoccurring dreams is supported by several psychological theories, such as those by Freud and Cartwright, which suggest that dreams have significance and may require resolution. Yet, Hobson's activation-synthesis theory challenges the idea that all dreams are meaningful by proposing they could simply be the brain's attempt to make sense of neural activity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that reoccurring dreams are thought to include issues that we must resolve in order for the dream to cease could be considered true based on various psychological theories of dream analysis. For instance, Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory suggested that dreams are a manifestation of our unconscious desires and conflicts, which require resolution. However, empirical research, such as the studies by Rosalind Cartwright, indicates that dreams reflect life events that are significant to the dreamer. This was evidenced by a correlation between the thoughts of women going through a divorce during the day and the appearance of their former spouses in their dreams. Moreover, Carl Jung's analytical psychology speaks to the presence of universal archetypes and the collective unconscious, suggesting that dreams may have consistent meanings across different individuals. Alan Hobson's activation-synthesis theory, on the other hand, proposed that dreams might not necessarily have meaning but instead could be a byproduct of our brain's attempt to interpret random neural activity during REM sleep. Despite differing views, these theories contribute to our understanding of why dreams reoccur and whether they hold personal significance or are part of a mental process during sleep.