Final answer:
The statement that democratic union processes make leaders less responsive is false. Democratic unions implement officer elections to increase responsiveness to membership by allowing members to choose their leaders and hold them accountable.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'the processes in democratic unions, such as officer elections, make the union leaders less responsive to the membership' is false. In democratic unions, officer elections are intended to increase responsiveness to the membership by allowing members to choose their leaders and hold them accountable for their actions and decisions.
Moreover, the union leaders are elected to represent the interests of the union members, meaning their primary role is to be responsive to the members' needs and concerns.
Voting within democratic unions is an exercise of member rights and is a mechanism through which workers can influence the direction of the union's policies and its approach to negotiations and advocacy. The very nature of a democratic union is to give a voice and power to its members, ensuring that the leadership is accountable and responsive.
Therefore, rather than making leaders less responsive, these processes are designed to ensure that leaders remain connected to the interests of the membership.