119k views
2 votes
The Byrnes Act of 1936 allowed employers to transport strikebreakers for the purpose of using force or threats against union organizers.

a. True
b. False

User Vaysage
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The statement regarding the Byrnes Act of 1936 is false, as there was no such act that allowed employers to transport strikebreakers to use force or threats against union organizers. Relevant labor legislation from the era is the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, which did limit union activities.

This correct answer b. False

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that The Byrnes Act of 1936 allowed employers to transport strikebreakers for the purpose of using force or threats against union organizers is false.

There is no such act known as the Byrnes Act relating to labor practices from that year. However, the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, a significant piece of labor legislation, did place certain restrictions on labor unions and their activities.

This Act was a response to growing concerns about the power of unions and resulted in limiting some of their capacities to strike, organize, and engage in political activities.

User Nastassia
by
8.3k points