Final answer:
Apex Corp. is engaged in parallel importing by diverting goods from France to England for a higher profit, which involves importing goods between markets without the brand owner's consent. Thus, the option 2 is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the scenario where Apex Corp., a wholesaler for Global Electronics, diverts goods from the French market to the English market for a higher profit, Apex Corp. is engaged in parallel importing. Parallel importing refers to the practice of purchasing products in one country, typically at lower prices, and then importing them into another country without the permission of the intellectual property owner. This is distinct from black marketing, which involves illegal transactions, smuggling, where goods are moved illegally across borders to avoid taxes or import restrictions, industrial piracy, which involves copying or stealing industrial designs, trademarks, or patented technology, and backwashing, which is not a recognized term in this context.