Final answer:
In historical inquiry, investigative input is evaluated by historians or researchers who carefully examine the sources, evidence, biases, expertise, consensus, and motivations behind claims.
Step-by-step explanation:
In historical inquiry, all investigative input should be carefully evaluated by the historian or researcher.
This evaluation involves examining the sources of information, the evidence used to support the information, and any potential biases that may be present. Historians need to consider the expertise of the person providing the information and whether there is a consensus among experts in the field.
Additionally, historians should question the motivations behind claims and critically analyze the evidence and perspectives presented.