Final answer:
The idea that urban structure models are universal is false; different cities have unique urban morphologies influenced by local geography, culture, and history. Models like the Latin American Model were developed to better fit the structure of cities in varying contexts, showing that not all models apply universally.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that models of urban structure are universal and can be applied to cities in diverse world regions is false. While there are some commonalities in urban development, the geography, culture, and history of a region dictate unique aspects of its urban morphology. Urban models such as the concentric zone model, sector model, and multiple nuclei model were developed primarily in the context of Western urban centers, particularly those in the United States.
These models may not necessarily apply to cities in other parts of the world. For instance, geographers Ernest Griffin and Larry Ford created the Latin American Model in recognition that other models did not fit well with the structure of cities in parts of the developing world, particularly those that had been colonized by Spain.
Thus, urban morphology is influenced by a complex set of factors that can vary significantly from one city to another. The multiple nuclei model can differ based on regional zoning laws or the historical context of the city's development, demonstrating the non-universality of urban models.