Final answer:
The fairness of penalizing individuals who do not register for the selective service is a debated issue, with historical examples showing instances of inequity in conscription laws. Supporters view it as a civic duty supporting national defense, while opponents see it as an infringement on freedom.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether it is fair for individuals who do not register for the draft to face penalties is a complex and contentious issue. Historically, the United States has used conscription to fill military ranks during times of need, such as during the Civil War and World War II. Registration for selective service is currently required by law for males at age 18, with potential consequences for non-compliance including being charged with a crime, denial of federal financial aid, and ineligibility for federal employment. Supporters of this system argue that it is a civic duty and a necessary component of national defense preparedness. Opponents may view it as an infringement on individual freedom and question the fairness, especially in consideration of moral or religious objections.
During historical drafts, such as the one enacted by the Enrollment Act during the Civil War, there were instances of inequity and discrimination in how the laws were applied. This raises questions about whether the current system is equitable and just. Furthermore, debates about voting rights and desfranchisement highlight the importance of civic participation and the consequences of denying it. The selective service registration requirement has parallels, as it ties the obligation to defend the nation with access to certain rights and privileges.