Final answer:
The statement is false; organized labor in the United States often opposes MNCs because they are seen as contributing to job outsourcing and potentially lowering domestic wages despite some benefits for the global workforce.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that organized labor in the United States is generally supportive of multinational corporations (MNCs) because they believe that MNCs improve wages for workers in the U.S. is false. Many labor unions are critical of MNCs due to the perception that they contribute to outsourcing and drive down domestic wages by taking advantage of cheaper labor abroad. While MNCs sometimes provide higher wages and better benefits in developing countries compared to local businesses, the overall view of MNCs by U.S. labor unions is contentious. Opponents of MNCs argue they are a leading cause of unemployment in the U.S., potentially weakening the domestic economy. Additionally, the benefits and costs of increased trade and involvement of MNCs in the global market are not distributed evenly, and while it might raise the productivity and average wages for U.S. workers, it can amplify inequalities. Meanwhile, proponents of MNCs suggest that they help in lowering the prices of consumer goods in the U.S. and create jobs in developing countries. These jobs can flow money into local communities and lead to infrastructure improvements. Nevertheless, it remains a complex issue with supporters highlighting the positive impact on global living standards and critics pointing out potential negative impacts on U.S. labor. It's important to note that U.S. workers, particularly those in manufacturing sectors traditionally represented by unions, can be disadvantaged by the lower-cost labor used by MNCs in other countries. Labor unions view themselves as protectors of workers' rights and pay, often opposing practices they believe undermine these in the long-term.