Final answer:
Yolanda's suggestion to her client represents an ethical dilemma, which involves a complex choice between various moral priorities. The advice also engages in stereotyping, suggesting a preconceived notion about young mothers and their futures. An ethics of care, as emphasized by Carol Gilligan, is a more appropriate framework that should guide such sensitive and personal decision-making.
Step-by-step explanation:
Yolanda's directive to her young pregnant client to consider adoption instead of continuing with the pregnancy can be categorized as an ethical dilemma. An ethical dilemma arises when a situation involves a choice between competing moral imperatives where there is no clear ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answer. In this case, the ethical dilemma is between the potential well-being and future prospects of the young person and their autonomy in making a deeply personal life decision.
Beyond the immediate ethical dilemma, such advice also suggests a form of stereotyping. Stereotyping occurs when an individual is subject to an oversimplified standardized image or idea held by others. Yolanda's assertion adopts a stereotype that young mothers cannot successfully pursue higher education or have a fulfilling future. This ignores the varied experiences and outcomes of young mothers, many of whom have successfully balanced child-rearing responsibilities with personal development and academic achievement.
It’s vital to recognize and respect the complex, individual nature of these decisions and offer support without coercion, which aligns with Carol Gilligan's notion that an ethics of care is crucial in moral thought. This approach highlights the importance of understanding and compassion towards others' situations and decisions, valuing their emotions and autonomy.