Final answer:
Observation and interviewing are two common research methods in social science. Observation can be less expensive as it requires minimal financial resources, while interviewing may involve costs such as participant recruitment and compensation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Observation and interviewing are two common methods used in social science research. Each method has its own advantages and drawbacks, including cost.
Observation involves directly observing and recording behavior without direct interaction with participants. This method can be less expensive as it typically requires minimal financial resources. Researchers can simply observe people in their natural environment without needing to compensate participants or conduct face-to-face interviews.
Interviewing, on the other hand, requires the researcher to engage with participants and ask questions to gather information. This method may involve costs such as participant recruitment, compensation, and data collection tools. Depending on the circumstances, interviewing can be more expensive than observation.
Therefore, the statement that interviewing is less expensive than observation is False.