Final answer:
The reason 'guaranteed back pay for strikers' is not typically a deterrent to hiring replacement workers during a strike; it relates to workers' feelings toward the necessity of unions following the introduction of labor protection laws. Employers consider several factors, such as training time, legal costs, and workplace tensions, before hiring replacements.
Step-by-step explanation:
An employer might refrain from hiring replacement workers during a strike for several reasons. Some of the potential considerations are insufficient time to train new employees, the potential cost of court suits, and tension and possibly violence at the picket line between strikers and replacements. However, 'guaranteed back pay for strikers' is not typically a reason that would prevent an employer from hiring replacement workers during a strike. Instead, it involves the issue of unions and legislation about workers' rights. Over time, as elected representatives have passed laws concerning work conditions, overtime, parental leave, regulation of pensions, and other issues, these have somewhat mitigated the perceived necessity for unions among workers.
abor-management conflicts, such as those that occur when workers strike for better conditions and higher wages, can affect whether employers decide to hire replacements. Historic events and employment trends show that employers may consider alternatives to hiring due to the potential costs and risks associated with replacing their workforce during labor disputes.