Final answer:
The statement that the Steelworkers' 'Trilogy' recognized that arbitrators have far more expertise than judges in interpreting the common law of the shop is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the Steelworkers' 'Trilogy' recognized that arbitrators have far more expertise than judges in interpreting the common law of the shop is True.
In the context of labor disputes, the Steelworkers' 'Trilogy' refers to a series of three landmark decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that expanded the role of arbitrators in interpreting labor contracts and resolving grievances. These decisions recognized that arbitrators, who have specialized knowledge and experience in labor relations, are better equipped than judges to interpret the complex and specific provisions of labor contracts. Therefore, the statement is true.