Final answer:
The assertion that employers are not concerned with fair representation because unions assume full liability is false. Both parties are invested in protecting employee rights and maintaining legal and cooperative relations. The matter of liability and union impact on employer bankruptcy is complex and involves various factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that employers are not typically concerned about the fair representation issue because the union assumes full liability when it breaches this obligation is false. Employers must still concern themselves with fair representation as it relates to labor laws and maintaining a cooperative relationship with the union. Issues of fair representation can potentially result in legal disputes, affect workplace morale, and influence the employer-union dynamic, which could impact the overall operation of a business.
It is incorrect to assume that unions assume “full liability” in instances where they may breach fair representation obligations. Both employers and unions have vested interests in ensuring that employees' rights are adequately protected, according to existing labor laws. Moreover, employers must guard against any practices that could be seen as undermining the collective bargaining process or suggesting a lack of good faith in dealing with unions.
Universal generalizations suggest that issues surrounding employment, unions, pay, and discrimination evolve over time. Therefore, both employers and unions must be proactive in their approaches to these matters, constantly adjusting to changing laws and societal expectations. The relationship between high wages due to union involvement and the financial viability of a firm is complex, and a firm's risk of bankruptcy is influenced by a multitude of factors, not solely the percentage of union employees or their wages.