Final answer:
The exception to a union's right to engage in product picketing involving a primary and neutral secondary employer is known as the Merged Product Doctrine. This doctrine becomes relevant in complex labor disputes where the work of both unionized and neutral employees are intertwined in the production process.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement of position which involves the exception to a union's right to engage in product picketing when the primary employer product being struck is very intertwined with a neutral, secondary employer is called the Merged Product Doctrine. This legal principle recognizes that there can be complications in labor disputes when a product is created through the combined efforts of workers from both the primary (unionized) and secondary (neutral) employers, which can affect the rights and allowable tactics in union picketing.
The Merged Product Doctrine is a nuanced aspect of labor law, touching upon the complexities of labor strikes and picketing, especially relevant in cases where joint production processes might intertwine the interests of different employers and their respective workforces. An example of a labor dispute where this doctrine might be relevant is when labor-saving technologies are introduced, sparking union opposition over concerns of job loss.The statement of position which involves the exception to a union's right to engage in product picketing when the primary employer product being struck is very intertwined with a neutral, secondary employer is called the General Electric doctrine.