120k views
1 vote
Conventional interest arbitration has been criticized because arbitrators have been accused of "splitting the difference."

a. True
b. False

User Belostoky
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

It is true that majority rule can fail to produce a single preferred outcome when faced with more than two choices due to the Condorcet Paradox, where the majority's preferences create a nontransitive cycle without a clear winner.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is true that majority rule can fail to produce a single preferred outcome when faced with more than two choices due to the Condorcet Paradox, where the majority's preferences create a nontransitive cycle without a clear winner.

The statement is true: Majority rule can fail to produce a single preferred outcome when there are more than two choices. This phenomenon occurs due to an issue known as Cycling or the Condorcet Paradox, in which there is no clear majority because preferences are nontransitive across three or more options.

For instance, in a situation where there are three options, A, B, and C, the majority prefers A over B, B over C, and C over A. This creates a cycle without a definitive majority preference, highlighting a limitation in the decision-making process of majority rule.

User Mattyohe
by
6.9k points