Final answer:
Jurisdictional disputes often arise when two or more unions claim control over specific work, especially within the layered structure of state and federal courts in the U.S. These disputes may involve cases related to federal law or constitutional issues and can be resolved by higher federal courts, ultimately by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jurisdictional disputes can occur when two or more unions claim jurisdiction over specific work assignments. Such disputes may arise within the framework of a complex legal system that includes both state and federal courts. In the United States, jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear a case and to make a binding legal judgment. The federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law, disputes between states, and disputes between residents of different states. Meanwhile, state courts generally manage cases involving state laws. However, cases that involve both state and federal jurisdiction can complicate matters.
For example, any case can potentially move to the federal courts if it involves a federal law or constitutional issue, even after progressing through the state court system. This is particularly relevant when state regulations are contradicted by federal laws, leading to a clash between the different levels of government. The resolution to such conflicts often rests with the federal courts, with the U.S. Supreme Court holding the role as the final arbiter in disputes over jurisdiction.