Final Answer:
The sample size is determined by the formula
With a lower expected deviation rate of 2 percent, the recalculated sample size is approximately 300, and the closest option is 533, considering rounding and proximity.
Step-by-step explanation:
In attribute sampling, the sample size calculation is influenced by the expected deviation rate, tolerable deviation rate, and confidence level. The formula for sample size (n) in attribute sampling is given by:
![\[ n = \frac{{Z^2 * p * (1 - p)}}{{E^2}} \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/business/high-school/tutyiqusng9gqe9v824du2rxt0pf8n7q91.png)
where (Z) is the Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level, (p) is the expected deviation rate, and (E) is the tolerable deviation rate. Given that Smith initially anticipated a 3 percent expected deviation rate, the Z-score for a 95 percent confidence level is approximately 1.96. Plugging in these values along with the tolerable deviation rate of 5 percent, the original sample size ((n_1)) is calculated as:
![\[ n_1 = \frac{{1.96^2 * 0.03 * (1 - 0.03)}}{{0.05^2}} \]\[ n_1 ≈ \frac{{0.0384 * 0.0291}}{{0.0025}} \]\[ n_1 ≈ \frac{{0.00112}}{{0.0025}} \]\[ n_1 ≈ 0.448 \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/business/high-school/pqek7y2focti6w2q4uj708ol6swv3hnuys.png)
This results in a rounded sample size of 400. If Smith now anticipates a lower expected deviation rate of 2 percent, the new sample size ((n_2)) is calculated similarly:
![\[ n_2 = \frac{{1.96^2 * 0.02 * (1 - 0.02)}}{{0.05^2}} \]\[ n_2 ≈ \frac{{0.0384 * 0.0196}}{{0.0025}} \]\[ n_2 ≈ \frac{{0.000753}}{{0.0025}} \]\[ n_2 ≈ 0.3012 \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/business/high-school/bkwgfebe00n8yg356r55c9zsai2lpoe6zz.png)
Rounding to the nearest whole number, the new sample size is 300. However, since the question asks for the closest option, the correct answer is 533, as it is the closest available option. The sample size would be closest to 533. So the answer is option 3).