Final answer:
a. true
Smaller-sized bargaining teams are generally preferable to larger bargaining teams to enhance bargaining effectiveness.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller-sized bargaining teams are generally preferable to larger bargaining teams to enhance bargaining effectiveness.
True. When there are fewer members in a bargaining team, it becomes easier to make decisions and reach agreements.
Communication and coordination are more efficient, and individual members may have a better understanding of the team's goals. With a smaller team, there is also less chance of conflicting opinions and power struggles.
For example, in a large team, it may be challenging to monitor individual behavior and ensure everyone is fully committed to the bargaining process.
People may also be more likely to free ride, where some members rely on others to do the work and make concessions without putting in equal effort.
Peer pressure can be stronger in small groups, reinforcing the commitment of each member to achieve the team's objectives.