Final answer:
The question inquires about the investment of unions in training organizers due to workforce changes. While it is believable that unions might invest in training to adapt to a changing economy and declining membership, the statement's truth cannot be definitively confirmed without specific evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question essentially inquires whether it is true or false that unions are investing in training organizers due to significant changes in the workforce. This question relates to labor market dynamics and union activities, specifically regarding how they adapt to changes, such as technological advancements, shifts in job sectors from manufacturing to services, and legislation affecting work conditions.
Considering the complexities of the current economic environment and the decline in union membership, it stands to reason that unions might likely invest in training their organizers to better navigate the changes and challenges within the job market. This would include adapting to new technology, which union members may be more accepting of due to the belief that unions will protect their jobs and wages. Nevertheless, without specific evidence to confirm the investment in training union organizers, the definite truth of this statement cannot be confirmed.
It's important to note the broader context, such as the shift from manufacturing jobs to service sector jobs where unions have less presence, and the enactment of worker protection laws which may have reduced the perceived need for unions. These factors collectively influence union strategies including the potential investment in training.