Final answer:
With the given references, we address several historical and political facts. Higher voting rates in the US compared to Sweden and South Korea, the role of term limits on female legislature representation, and the effect of the necessary and proper clause on national government power are discussed, each with a specific true or false determination.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim that decertification elections have nearly doubled in the last decade is not directly addressed with the information provided, hence it cannot be conclusively answered as true or false. However, based on the reference information given regarding voting rates, term limits, women's suffrage during the Revolutionary Era, the Louisiana Purchase, and the market revolution, we can infer that topics concerning political processes and historical facts are at play.
For example, it is false that voting rates are higher in the United States than in Sweden and South Korea. Term limits have indeed led to a statistically significant increase in the number of women serving in state legislatures, making that statement true. No state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women the right to vote, which is also true. The statement that the Antifederalists were really Federalists is false, as they were opposing groups. The Louisiana Purchase doubling the territory of the United States is indeed true, and the market revolution brought many social and economic changes to the United States, which is also true. Lastly, the necessary and proper clause has not limited national government power; rather, it has expanded it, making this statement false.