Final answer:
Company-controlled unions are not a method of organizing real unions because they are management-led and lack true bargaining power, serving to undermine the establishment of independent worker-led unions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The phrase that completes the statement "The following is NOT a method or procedure in organizing unions" is company-controlled unions. Unlike bottom-up organizing, which is a grassroots approach, and other traditional methods of union organizing that include holding elections or signing union cards by a majority of workers, company-controlled unions are not an effective method of organizing because they lack real power and independence from management.
Company unions, sometimes operational during historical contexts like World War II to maintain production and harmony without striking, have often been used to discourage the formation of independent unions. They may provide minor advantages or one-time bonuses to the workers, but they are not actual unions in the sense of being worker-led and worker-controlled entities that can negotiate with management on equal footing. The attempt to discredit independent unions through the guise of company unions is a strategy pursued by firms to maintain control over negotiations and reduce the influence of legitimate unions among the workforce.
In contrast, traditional methods of union organizing involve the collective action of workers to democratically establish a body that represents their interests, whether through secret ballot elections in the U.S. or signing official cards in Canada. Company-controlled unions, being management-led, cannot qualify as a legitimate method of union organizing because they are primarily a tool for management to shape employee relations to their advantage without granting workers genuine representation or bargaining power.